So I know there are plenty of feeds about these issues and I've been through most of them yet I can't make it work. I get really lost with .js.
So I'm using very simple pop up windows that provide more contents on a topic by cicking on the title of the topic. I'm using a simple css code:
.black_overlay {
display: none;
position: absolute;
top: 0%;
left: 0%;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: black;
z-index: 1001;
-moz-opacity: 0.8;
opacity: .80;
filter: alpha(opacity=80);
}
.white_content {
display: none;
position: absolute;
left: 20%;
top:25%;
width: 70%;
height: auto;
padding: 10px;
border: 6px solid #ed7d86;
background-color: white;
text-align: center;
z-index: 1002;
overflow: auto;
}
And html:
<div class="flex-item">
<a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="document.getElementById('TITLE').style.display='block';
document.getElementById('fade').style.display='block'">TITLE</a>
<div id="TITLE" class="white_content">Something else about TITLE.
<a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="document.getElementById('TITLE').style.display='none';
document.getElementById('fade').style.display='none'">Close</a></div>
</div>
This code works great until I try it on elements that are lower on the page in which case the box obviously continue showing at the set top and left position, which means that I have to scroll back up to see it. If I get rid of top and left conditions, I just end up with the box showing up randomly at some corner of the page.
I also want people to be able to leave the box just by clicking on the black_overlay area. Can anyone recommend a fix that would work with my code?
Ah well, not much success with my question. Wanted to let you know that I changed the position of the .white_content to fixed and it solved my problem for positioning. I'm still working on closing the window by clicking outside the box without changing all my code.
I have the following structure:
<div id="hold">
<div id="hold-left">content</div>
<div id="hold-right">content</div>
</div>
hold-left floats to the left and hold-right floats to the right. The widths are 40% and 55% when the page is loaded. The thing is, hold-right is a sort of preview of something and the user needs to be able to resize it.
This is easily done using JavaScript (the user selects a zoom level radio button), however the issue I am now facing is that, if it is enlarged, it drops down beneath hold-left. What I'd like it to do is float over freely to the outside of the parent div.
How do I go about this? Can it be done through CSS at all, or do I need to dynamically resize the parent every time I resize hold-right?
Have you considered using a left margin on .hold-right?
.hold-left{
float:left;
width:40%;
}
.hold-right{
margin-left:45%;
}
Also, generally you should use classes, not IDs.
You can try with display: table, and table-cell.
The table will need to be 100% width and no width specified for table-cell. Then the content will "resize" the cells.
Otherwise, you will need to use javascript to update both cells.
Use position property in css. Checkout this
position: relative; in the parent.
position: absolute; in the each child.
#hold {
position: relative;
}
#hold-left {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: red;
}
#hold-right {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
background: yellow;
}
#zoomLevelSelector {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 0;
}
I'm building an app in Webkit for Android using HTML and CSS. I have fixed position header and sometimes fixed position footer(based on the module). When the content is more, I don't want the scrollbar to overlay the fixed header. Hiding it behind the header will also work. How can I achieve this without fixing height for the wrapper or using height: calc(); CSS for the wrapper?
I want app scrollbar to be like this:
Instead, it is like this now:
Here is the sample code:
.header {
position: fixed;
background-color: red;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
z-index: 999;
height: 60px;
}
.wrapper {
padding-top: 60px;
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.footer {
position: fixed;
background-color: grey;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
}
jsfiddle
You said that you don't want to fixe the .wrapperheight, but I think, you should fixe it, because there is no way to hide this scrollbar behind the div header element.
.wrapper {
margin-top: 60px;
min-height: 100%;
height: 320px;
overflow-y: auto;
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/9hy6ybsz/4/
I'm not sure if my solution gonna work for you. You need to setup the height of your div="wrapper" and add CSS property overflow-y:
height: calc(100% - (60px + 50px));
Example, where 60px is the header height and 50px is the footer height
.wrapper {
margin-top: 60px;
overflow: auto;
background: yellow;
height: calc(100% - (60px + 50px));
display:block;
}
Working JSFiddle -> http://jsfiddle.net/9hy6ybsz/1/
Create a new div tag , which acts as a parent tag.
and apply scroll for it.
then create the header div and maintain Fixed position.so you can get the scroll over the fixed DIV!
I'm coding an image overlay w/ jQuery, and I got it working (somewhat). If you hover over the first image, it successfully appears; however, if you hover over the second one, it doesn't even work. I don't even know what the problem is! I think it has to do with unique IDs or whatever. I tried classes, and it didn't work.
Here is the fiddle :: http://jsfiddle.net/PFWcz/7/
$(document).ready(function () {
$('.overlay-link').mouseover(function () {
$(this).find('.overlay').fadeIn(200);
}).mouseleave(function () {
$(this).find('.overlay').fadeOut(200);
});
});
There are a few issues. As esqew pointed out, you're using the same IDs, which must be unique.
Addressing that, you'll still see the "same" overlay in your fiddle (http://jsfiddle.net/PFWcz/7/), but it's actually not - you're just now seeing a positioning issue.
Take a look at this fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/PFWcz/10/
You'll notice that when you hover over the first image, the red overlay is "1", and when you hover over the second image, the overlay is "2".
Previously (with the "helloooooo" text), the red overlays appeared the same (because of the content and positioning)...
Address the ID and position issues, and it should work.
Here's a fiddle demonstrating fixed position and ID:
http://jsfiddle.net/PFWcz/16/
The main changes is giving the container (<div>) positioning:
div {
float: left;
margin: 30px;
position: relative;
}
Also, I removed offsets (left, top) and floats, applying those to the parent container. A quick, simple fix.
You need to make your overlay-link elements your containers from which child elements inherit positions.
<a class="overlay-link">
<img src="https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/67256/screenshots/1191507/shooot.png"/>
<span class="overlay"><i>hellllllllooooooo</i></span>
</a>
Your overlay-link class needs to have position: relative and will define the position and size of it and its children:
.overlay-link {
position: relative;
display: block;
width: 292px;
height: 219px;
margin: 30px;
}
Any child inside needs to have position: absolute and its width and height set to 100% of the container:
img {
position: absolute;
border-radius: 2px;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.overlay {
background-color: rgba(223, 71, 71,0.70);
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
border-radius: 2px;
display: none;
text-align:center;
}
Now when you hover over an element, it will create the overlay over that element and not the other one as you were experiencing earlier.
Jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/PFWcz/14/
You're using the same id, which must be unique. Use the class attribute.
As some of the answered already said there is issue with the id's, I don't want to repeat. Since you have a multiple place where you want to show some text on rollover, using class would be a better solution/way to go ahead with.
Here is the change I did in the fiddle:
.overlay-link { /*This class is added. Since an absolute positioned element places itself relative to its parent who is either a relative positioned element or an absolute positioned element. I made the parent of the .overlay div relative.*/
position: relative;
background-color: #ff0;
}
.overlay {
position: absolute;
background-color: rgba(223, 71, 71,0.70);
left: -322px; /*Positioning the .overlay element based on its parents left*/
width: 292px;
height: 219px;
border-radius: 2px;
top: 30px;
display: none;
text-align:center;
}
.overlay i { /*There is no .shot element in the DOM. I replaced it by .overlay*/
background-color: #df4747;
border-radius: 999px;
padding: 10px;
width: 60px;
height: 60px;
color: #fff;
font-size: 30px;
top: 80px;
left: 116px;
position: absolute;
display: block;
}
This is based on my understanding. Let me know if it works.
Here, this is what you want
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/D33Yk/
$(window).on('load',function () {
$('.overlay-link').mouseover(function(){
var overlay = $(this).children('.overlay');
var img = $(this).children('img');
$(overlay).css('left',$(img).offset().left);
$(overlay).css('top',$(img).offset().top);
$(overlay).css('width',$(img).width());
$(overlay).css('height',$(img).height());
$(overlay).fadeIn(200);
}).mouseleave(function(){
$(this).children('.overlay').fadeOut(200);
});
});
Because you had the overlay positioned absolutely in CSS, both overlays always covered the first image. I now set the left, top, width and height in JS, so the overlays cover their respective image.
I also changed this in CSS:
.overlay {
display: none;
position: absolute;
background-color: rgba(223, 71, 71,0.70);
border-radius: 2px;
text-align:center;
}
removed the top, left, width, height
...and this in HTML (I changed both, but I only show one since they are identical):
<div>
<a class="overlay-link">
<img src="https://d13yacurqjgara.cloudfront.net/users/67256/screenshots/1191507/shooot.png"/>
<span class="overlay"><i>hellllllllooooooo</i></span>
</a>
</div>
changed all the id's to classes, and removed id where it was not necessary
I'm having some trouble with a page that has a floating background image (absolutely positioned) where the image is dynamically changed out via javascript. Basically this is a big gallery that changes behind a portfolio:
I have a section of markup that looks like this:
<div class="content">
<div class="content-container">
<div class="content-image">
<img id="galleryTarget" src="../images/main/source.jpg" class="image-resize" alt="background image"/>
</div>
...etc...
Here's the relevant CSS classes:
.image-resize {
position: absolute;
min-height: 750px;
min-width: 1000px;
width: 100%;
left: 0;
text-align: left;
vertical-align: middle;
margin-top: -25%;
top: 25%;
}
.content-image {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 200px;
width: 100%;
min-height: 750px;
max-height: 750px;
min-width:1000px;
overflow:visible;
opacity: 0.5;
z-index: 1;
}
.content-container {
position: relative;
min-height: 750px;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
max-height: 750px;
overflow: hidden;
background: purple;
z-index: -5;
}
This is all absolutely positioned so that I can swap out the image source with Javascript and then dynamically resize the container (background) to fill the new content. There's minimum bounds so it always has a size.
What I'm trying to do is to pin this image to a CENTER point so that when it is resized the interesting parts of the image (rarely the top left corner) are displayed.
In the inspector in chrome I see that top and margin-top are never the same value even though they have the same (percentage) value. What am I missing here?
Example:
top: 187.5px and margin-top: -389.5px. It looks as though margin-top uses the img-source resolution and top uses something for the life of me I can't figure out--I'm assuming min-height + the offset in the page?
Any help here would be appreciated, this is a rather large part of the design and I'd love to have it better than what it is.
Browsers:
Chrome Version: 30.0.1599.66 m
Android Chrome: 30.0.1599.82
This does fix the problem in chrome--but I'd like to know why it is using 1000px as the baseline for the margin instead of the 750px of the unit.
/*Hack of a vector similar to 50%*/
margin-top: calc(-50% * 0.75);
top: 50%;