I wanted to change the style of some SVG images. Like usual, i did it with css, but it didn't do anything. I noticed that when i inspect the page, in the style part, the style is under the tag 'element.style', and that's probably why i always failed to access.
I also tried to change the style with script, but same issue. When i tried console.log() the value, it showed the value changed to the right one i wanted in the console, but still it didn't get applied in the page and in the style part of the inspect panel, the styles are still under the element.style tag.
I created the component so as to use in multiple places in the main component.
<template>
<div :class="iconsClassName" :ref="iconsClassName">
<div :class="iconClassName" v-for="(icon, index) in icons" :key="index">
<a :href="icon.mediaLink" target="_blank">
<svg style="width:16px;height:16px" viewBox="0 0 24 24">
<path fill="#ffffff" :d="icon.icon" />
</svg>
</a>
</div>
</div>
</template>
css part in the main component,and i want to change the style in one of the places where i used the above component.
.mediaBottom a svg {
width: 21px;
height: 24px;
}
I know i can make it work by binding the value with props and give values every time when i used it, but i'm just curious why the above solutions didn't work?
Normal css cannot override inline-style. If you want to override inline-style, you need to add !important. For example:
.mediaBottom a svg {
width: 21px !important;
height: 24px !important;
}
I have some colors that when clicked I want to change the value of some css.
I want to change the color css value of this css :
article .teleprompter p
{
padding-bottom: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
color:white;
}
The html:
<div class="swatch concrete" onClick="javascript:changeBTC('#95a5a6')"></div>
This is the java script I use for a similar function . This one changes the background color:
<script>
function changeBGC(color)
{
document.getElementById("teleprompter").style.backgroundColor = color;
}
</script>
Would it make a difference in JavaScript code if the css was in a separate style sheet?
don't add javascript: in onclick code - the borwser already knows it is javascript! You only need to add javascript: to an <a href> to tell the browser it is script rather than a URL:
So you just need this:
<div class="swatch concrete" onClick="changeBTC('#95a5a6')"></div>
or you could do this if you wanted to use a link:
<a class="swatch concrete" href="javascript:changeBTC('#95a5a6')"></a>
Your function is changeBGC, but you're executing changeBTC. Replace changeBTC('#95a5a6') with changeBGC('#95a5a6')
It will not make a difference if the css was in a seperate file as long as you are refering the css file in your html page.
Moreover in css you are refering the object as class in css (.teleprompter) and in javascript you are refering the object with id (getElementById). So either use id in both the places or class in both the places
I have this example:
http://codepen.io/dbugger/pen/IuDxw
Where I have an insertion point inside the Shadow DOM and I try to apply an style to it, making it disappear. But the image is still visible. I suspect there is some principle I haven't undestood propely from the Web Components.
Can someone explain me what am I doing wrong?
The trick is that the image is not, as kkemple mentioned, part of the Shadow DOM, but rather the Light DOM, which means it's not directly accessible from inside the component. It's user provided content, like the parameters passed into a class constructor in an OOP language. If at all possible, then, the user should provide their own styles to go with it.
That being said, there are definitely valid use cases where the component author wants to style user-provided content. Hiding certain parts of the user-provided markup based on attributes on the host, events (clicks), etc. is definitely one of those. In that case, wrap the <content> element in a Shadow DOM element and hide that:
<template>
<style>
.image {
display: none;
}
</style>
<div class="image">
<content></content>
</div>
</template>
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/rCGqD
On a side note: It is technically possible to apply styles directly to Light DOM elements, but be aware that in many cases this is considered leaking implementation details to the outside world. If the first solution works, use that instead.
It is not working is because your code is not in the shadow DOM, the div and image is still accessible through default styling. I forked your codepen and added the styling so you could see.
var host = document.querySelector(".host");
var template = document.getElementById( 'template' );
var root = host.webkitCreateShadowRoot();
root.appendChild( template.content );
<template id="template">
<style>
.wrapper {
display: none;
}
</style>
<div class="wrapper">
<content selector=".img"></content>
</div>
<h2>In the Shadows</h2>
</template>
<style>
img {
border: 1px solid black;
}
</style>
<div class="host">
<img class="img" src="http://placehold.it/200x275&text=1" alt="" />
</div>
http://codepen.io/kkemple/pen/euBKs
I didn't go in to why it was not creating a shadow DOM element as your JS looked correct to me but here is a great article on shadow DOM web-ponents:
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/webcomponents/shadowdom/
Is there a way to extract hardcoded styles in html documents to external css file ? If not, do you have an idea on how to do this? Have you ever done it before ?
Example, from:
<div style="background-color: red">
<a style="font-weight: bold"></a>
</div>
to
<div id='st-01'>
<a id='st-02'><a/>
</div>
#st-01 { background-color: red }
#st-02 { font-weight: bold }
Not exactly what you are looking for but if you don't mind copying and pasting your HTML, try this. Not too many features but it does the job!
http://extractcss.com/
https://github.com/peterlazzarino/Inline-CSS-Extractor
You can use some JS/JQuery code to extract the styles, clear them, give elements an ID and add up css.
Check this example, you may extend it further.
$(document).ready(function(){
var i = 0;
var css = "";
$("div,a").each(function(){
$(this).attr("id","st-"+i);
css += "#"+$(this).attr("id")+"{"+$(this).attr("style")+"}";
$(this).removeAttr("style");
i++;
});
$("style").html(css);
});
http://jsfiddle.net/d8TaJ/
Is it possible to wrap an <a> tag around <div>s like so:
<a href=etc etc>
<div class="layout">
<div class="title">
Video Type
<div class="description">Video description</div>
</div>
</div>
</a>
Eclipse is telling me the div's are in the wrong place?
If this is not allowed. How can I make the entire 'layout' class become a link?
That structure would be valid in HTML5 since in HTML5 anchors can wrap almost any element except for other anchors and form controls. Most browsers nowadays have support for this and will parse the code in the question as valid HTML. The answer below was written in 2011, and may be useful if you're supporting legacy browsers (*cough* Internet Explorer *cough*).
Older browsers without HTML5 parsers (like, say, Firefox 3.6) will still get confused over that, and possibly mess up the DOM structure.
Three options for HTML4 - use all inline elements:
<a href=etc etc>
<span class="layout">
<span class="title">
Video Type
<span class="description">Video description</span>
</span>
</span>
</a>
Then style with display: block
Use JavaScript and :hover:
<div class="layout">
<div class="title">
Video Type
<div class="description">Video description</div>
</div>
</div>
And (assuming jQuery)
$('.layout').click(function(){
// Do something
}):
And
.layout:hover {
// Hover effect
}
Or lastly use absolute positioning to place an a anchor with CSS to cover the whole of .layout
<div class="layout">
<div class="title">
Video Type
<div class="description">Video description</div>
</div>
<a class="more_link" href="somewhere">More information</a>
</div>
And CSS:
.layout {
position: relative;
}
.layout .more_link {
position: absolute;
display: block;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
text-indent: -9999px;
z-index: 1000;
}
This won't work with older versions of IE, of course.
While the <a> tag is not allowed to contain <div> element, it is allowed to contain other inline elements such as <span>.
When I encountered the problem i swapped the div tag with a <span>. Since the span tag is an inline element, you need to apply a display:block to the css of your <span> element, in order to make it behave like the <div> block element.
This should be valid xhtml and does not require any javascript.
Here's an example:
<a href="#">
<span style="display:block">
Some content. Maybe some other span elements, or images.
</span>
</a>
Another simple solution - just add an onclick event handler to the div thusly:
<div class="layout" onclick="location.href='somewhere'">
<div class="title">
Video Type
<div class="description">Video description</div>
</div>
</div>
This works great for me but there is one small gotcha. I'm not sure how search engine friendly this is. I fear that google's web crawlers might not find this link so I also tend to include a traditional A HREF link somewhere in the block like this:
<div class="layout" onclick="location.href='destination_url'">
<div class="title">
Video Type
<div class="description">Video description</div>
</div>
This is a link
</div>
Timothy's solution is correct ... instead of wrapping an anchor around a div ... you simply give layout to the anchor element with display:block and add the size and width of the anchor ...
.div_class { width: 100px; height: 100px; }
.div_class a { width: 100px; height: 100px; display: block; }
<div class='div_class'></div>
HTML provides two general elements, where div is a natural block element, and span is a natural inline element. All other elements are similarly assigned to be a natural block or inline.
Now, while both can be made by css display to be any of inline, inline-block or block, they are still treated for enclosure purposes as their natural selves, hence the warning messages. Leopards and spots sort of thing.
However, css is only meant to be for making what an element looks like (presentation), but not actually be like (functionality), so it doesn't change an element's basic nature, though that gets very fuzzy in practice. A span made block becomes a bully that kicks everything else off the line, which is very un-inline sort of behaviour.
So, to mitigate against possible conflicts between their natural and css-induced behaviours, it is better to allow:
div or any natural block tag to only ever be block or inline-block.
span or any natural inline tag to only ever be inline or inline-block.
This will also mitigate against tending to build page structures that will likely end up churning out error and warning messages.
Basically, NEVER embed a natural block tag inside a natural inline tag, at any depth.
Why there is a really a distinction is perhaps due to a simplistic idea of what HTML was going to be used for when it was first dreamed up.
Certainly, framework makers got around a lot of these what-to-embed-where problems by just using myriads of divs everywhere, and 'divitis' was born, and still alive and well in every framework. Just have to press F12 in a browser on almost any commercial web page and drill down through a dozen divs. This very page has 15 unbroken levels of divs.
It is not hard to see why just settling on divs made sense. For example, a p tag may have a bunch of links to various sites, and that is ok because inline links are allowed in a block p. However, if not wanting to have query variables visible in those urls, then buttons are required. If only one, then the p can be put inside a form, as a p cannot contain a form.
The formaction attribute on a button can be used to target a url other than the form default, but it still does not allow independent forms, each with their own set of hidden inputs. A button can use the form attribute to use it with a form that isn't an ancestor, but it can get messy to keep track of.
For multiple links to different sites to appear as part of one paragraph though, the only way is to use a div instead of the p and then wrap each button in its own form set to inline. Most frameworks have to cope with so much more complex scenarios that nested divs are the only way to go.
It meant that they really only had to manage one tag per purpose and manage it as if it was an isolated environment. So what was meant to be an occasionally-used functional grouping tag became the web's Lego block. And none of them are going to risk breaking their frameworks by converting to HTML5 semantic tags in a hurry. In the end, semantic tags only really work for fairly static content rather than rich interactive sites.
I had tried to create custom solution using jQuery, which would imitate same behavior as a tag does, for parent DIV.
DEMO:
https://jsfiddle.net/kutec/m9vxhcke/
As per W3C standard, you cannot do this:
<div class="boxes">
<a href="http://link1.com" target="_blank">
<div class="box">
<h3>Link with _blank attr</h3>
</div>
</a>
</div>
You must follow this:
<div class="boxes">
<div class="box">
<h3>
Link with _blank attr
</h3>
</div>
</div>
But by following above code, you wouldn't get the whole DIV clickable :).
Correct structure should be something like this, which also allows you to click over the DIV to redirect on the given href value:
<div class="boxes" data-href="http://link1.com" data-target="_blank">
<div class="box">
<h3>
Link with _blank attr
</h3>
</div>
</div>
Simple Solution:
$(function() {
$('.boxes a').each(function(){
var aTag = $(this).attr('href');
$(this).parent().attr('data-href',aTag);
$("[data-href]").click(function() {
window.location.href = $(this).attr("data-href");
return false;
});
})
}(jQuery));
Dynamic Solution:
(function ( $ ) {
$.fn.dataURL = function() {
// variables
var el = $(this);
var aTag = el.find('a');
var aHref;
var aTarget;
// get & set attributes
aTag.each(function() {
var aHref = $(this).attr('href');
$(this).parent().attr('data-href',this);
aTarget = $(this).attr('target');
$(this).parent().attr('data-target',aTarget);
});
// imitation - default attributes' behavior on "data-" attributes
$(el).delegate('[data-href]','click', function() {
var loc = window.location.href;
loc = $(this).attr("data-href");
aTarget = $(this).attr('data-target');
if(aTarget == "_blank"){
window.open(loc);
} else {
window.location = loc;
}
return false;
});
//removing attributes from selector itself
el.removeAttr('data-href');
el.removeAttr('data-target');
// css
$('[data-href]').css('cursor','pointer');
};
}( jQuery ));
Final call:
<script>
$('.boxes').dataURL();
</script>
Hope this would be helpful :)
You would just want to style the "a" tag as display: block;
Eclipse is appropriately telling you that your HTML is not to spec (as a div tag is not allowed in an anchor tag).
But, since you seem to want to be visually making the anchor look like a big-ol-box, then simply style it as such :)
One easy way to make the div a link/clickable is by using html javascript onclick attribute:
<div class="clickable-div" onclick="location.href='#';"><div> ... </div></div>